Dear Judge Saylor:
From age 13 to 16 I was a shoeshine boy in a store and later served as a Peace Corps Volunteer in India.
So, I have been poor and seen poverty.
Your decision in case CV 19-11654-FDS is an egregious violation of Justice and hence your oath of office.
There are thousands of people in Massachusetts who cannot afford to pay for this constitutional right.
At what point does Justice prevail over court procedures and previous decisions?
My brother was a judge in the Mid-West and halfway through his career he said: There is very little justice in America. We should remove all the
judges, disbar all the attorney and start all over because we failed.
I asked, now that he is retired, if he still felt this way. He said yes!!
I unequivocally agree with him and don't know of anyone
who believes we live in a just society.
Justice is unavailable to the poor because of a lack of funds and knowledge. I understand both aspects, the latter because my father had a fourth-grade
education and my mother 7th grade.
The fees for low income Pro Se plaintiffs are waved by the Court? Is it to protect their Constitutional right to a trial?
Do you think there is anyone who cannot afford the licensing permit fees?
If you answer “yes” has your decision not severely violated your oath of office to protect the Constitution and citizens' rights?
Doesn't your decision reduce poor people to 2nd class citizenship?